15.16 Rural Risk: Geographic Disparities in Trauma Mortality

M. P. Jarman1, R. C. Castillo1, A. R. Carlini1, A. H. Haider2 1Johns Hopkins University School Of Public Health,Health Policy,Baltimore, MD, USA 2Brigham And Women’s Hospital,Surgery,Boston, MA, USA

Introduction: Treatment at a designated trauma center is proven to reduce mortality from traumatic injuries, but the majority of US residents in rural areas do not have timely access to Level I or II trauma centers. To date, no studies have used nationally representative date to quantify the impact of barriers to trauma care on injury mortality in rural populations.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 2006-2011 National Emergency Department Sample data to determine if mortality following traumatic injury differs across urban/rural classifications. Emergency department (ED) visits with ICD-9-CM codes for injuries (ICD-9-CM 800-959.9) as the primary or secondary diagnosis were included in these analyses, excluding superficial and foreign body injuries, late effects of injury, as well as records with missing urban/rural status or disposition from the ED (N=8,887,575). Mortality was defined as dying in the ED or in the hospital during the admission associated with the ED visit. Overall, 0.12% of ED encounters in the sample resulted in death (N=10,665) Odds of death were calculated using multiple logistic regression with patient residential urban/rural status, Injury Severity Score, comorbidities, trauma center designation, patient age, and patient gender as covariates. All analyses were performed using Stata 12.1.

Results: Residents from rural communities were 25% (p = 0.002) more likely to die of traumatic injury than non-rural residents, when controlling for severity, comorbidities, trauma center designation, age, and gender. Rural residents treated at Level I trauma centers were 3.06 times (p < 0.001) more likely to die of their injuries, compared to non-rural residents. Rural residents at Level II centers were 73% more likely to die (p = 0.002), and rural residents at Level IV centers were 13% more likely to die (p = 0.016), compared to non-rural residents. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between rural and non-rural residents with treated at Level III (p = 0.151).

Conclusion: People living in rural communities are significantly more likely than non-rural residents to die following traumatic injury. This disparity is largest at Level I trauma centers decreases at lower level trauma centers. Distance and travel time to treatment likely play a significant role in injury outcomes for rural residents, but measures of distance and time generally not available for nationally representative data that also include measures or rural/urban residence. Future analyses should explore the interaction between time to treatment, level of care, and outcomes for rural residents.