61.15 Blunt Cardiac Injury: Improved Outcomes or Misdiagnosis?

A. Azim1, B. Joseph1, T. Orouji Jokar1, N. Kulvatunyou1, T. O’Keeffe1, A. Tang1, R. Latifi1, D. Green1, G. Vercruysse1, R. Friese1, P. Rhee1 1University Of Arizona,Trauma Surgery,Tucson, AZ, USA

Introduction:
Blunt cardiac injury (BCI) is uncommon. Its diagnosis, treatment and significance remain controversial. When diagnosed it is often treated with anti-arrhythmic drugs but there is little known regarding the outcome or effectiveness. The aim of this study was to assess the trend of reporting BCI using a national database.

Methods:
Retrospective 6-year (2007-2012) review of National Trauma Data Base (NTDB) of all chest trauma patients. Patients with ICD-9 Code of blunt cardiac injury (861.01) were identified. Outcome measures were mortality and admission characteristics. Regression and trend analyses were performed.

Results:

A total of 10,408 patients were included in our study. The rate of BCI was 7.45 per 10,000 patients (10,412/13,957,987) and has been decreasing over years, from 8.9 per 10,000 patients in 2007 to 6.3 per 10,000 patients in 2012 (p < 0.001). Mean age (45 ± 27 vs. 46 ± 28, p = 0.29) and male gender dominance (66.5% vs. 67.4%, p = 0.42), emergency department systolic blood pressure (117 ± 49 vs. 89 ± 39, p = 0.07), and emergency department heart rate (89 ± 39 vs. 91 ± 36, p = 0.12) did not change during the study period. 18 patients (0.2%) were diagnosed to have an associated cardiac arrhythmia. Mortality rate from cardiac contusion declined during the study period (20.7% vs. 13.8%, p < 0.0001). Mortality rate increased with increasing Chest AIS (Chest AIS-1: 4.9% vs. Chest AIS-5: 40%, p=0.001) however there were 420 patients who were diagnosed with BCI without a chest trauma (Chest AIS = 0).

Conclusion:
The incidence of blunt cardiac injury is uncommon and continues to decrease. The mortality rate has also decreased by a third. The true significance as well as relevance is yet unknown.