40.01 The Use of Fluorescent-labeled Cetuximab for Image-guided Soft Tissue Sarcoma Surgery

N. K. Behnke1, A. C. Prince2, J. M. Warram1  1The University Of Alabama At Birmingham,Department Of Surgery,Birmingham, AL, USA 2University Of Alabama,School Of Medicine,Birmingham, Alabama, USA

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a heterogeneous group of solid malignancies whose treatment includes margin-negative resection. Large tumor size and anatomic constraints make margin assessment challenging. Fluorescence-guided surgical resection can help delineate intraoperative margins; preclinical studies demonstrate improved oncologic outcomes in other malignancies using cancer-specific imaging probes.  Recent literature describes cathepsin activated probes selective for STS, but no studies using disease-specific chemotherapeutic agents conjugated to imaging probes.  This novel strategy has potential to decrease unnecessary healthy tissue resection and improve oncologic outcomes by reducing margin-positive resections.

 

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in multiple subtypes of STS and is a potential target for fluorescence-guided surgery.  Recent studies show fluorescently labeled cetuximab, an FDA-approved, anti-EGFR antibody, to be safe and useful for margin assessment in head and neck cancer. Our aim was to evaluate its potential for STS, examining tumor-targeting specificity of two drug-probe conjugates, and comparing them to the described cathepsin-activated probes.  We hypothesize the drug-probe conjugates would successfully target STS, with superior tumor specificity.  We also aimed to determine the smallest tumor detectable by our imaging probe conjugate.

Methods: Athymic nude mice with subcutaneous HT1080 fibrosarcoma tumors were injected with one of five probes:  IRDye800CW fluorescent probe conjugated to either cetuximab (anti-EGFR) or DC101 (anti-VEGFR2), IRDye800CW conjugated to an isotype control (IgG), or a cathepsin-activated probe (IntegriSense 750 and Prosense 750). Fluorescence imaging was performed daily with open- and closed-field systems. Tumor-to-background ratios (TBR), signal washout times and normalized signal averages were evaluated.  On day 9, smallest resectable game evaluation was performed to assess sensitivity for detecting residual post-resection tumor

Results: At day 9 post-injection, the TBR of the cetuximab-IRDye800CW group (11.1) was significantly greater than Integrisense750 (6.88, p=0.005), the IgG-IRDye800CW control (4.44, p=0.00005), Prosense750 (2.35, p=0.00009), and DC101-IRDye800CW (1.87, p=0.00003). During in vivo imaging, cetuximab-IRDye800CW outperformed all other agents by several folds of contrast enhancement. The smallest resectable game evaluation demonstrated 1mm3 fragment detection using the cetuximab-IRDye800CW probe.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates superiority of cetuximab-IRDye800CW for disease-specific imaging in a subcutaneous animal model of STS.  The novel strategy of coupling improved margin-negative surgical resection with established chemotherapy has considerable translational significance and is an avenue for exploration with other drugs used to treat STS.