A. Coleoglou Centeno1, C. B. Horn1, M. M. Frisella1, C. M. Donald1, G. V. Bochicchio1, S. R. Eaton1, J. P. Kirby1, L. J. Punch1 1Washington University,Department Of Surgery,St. Louis, MO, USA
Introduction:
Enteroatmospheric fistulas (EAFs) are associated with the need for complex wound care. Negative Pressure Therapy (NPT) is a helpful adjunct in management of complex wounds. The use of NPT in the management of an EAF allows for both enhanced wound care as well as control of fistula efflux, but is technically difficult to apply. As part of a Visiting Preceptorship in Acute Care Surgery, we developed a cadaver-based model for training of nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) in NPT application to EAFs.
Methods:
The training model was developed for use in a hands-on application of NPT on an EAF using a cadaver model. The model was prepared by performing a midline laparotomy. Sigmoid colon was mobilized and ligated proximally. The distal bowel was cannulated with plastic tubing which was secured to the bowel and passed through the abdomen through a separate stab incision. This was connected to dilute solution of methylene blue mixed with saline. An additional resection of skin and fat was done to create a complex surrounding wound. We then performed a primary fascial closure and exteriorized the colon, maturing the edges of the bowel to the fascia thus simulating an EAF. Groups of two PAs or NPs along with course faculty applied the wound NPT to the EAF model.
Results:
A cadaver based model for EAF was created and NPT was successfully applied by the course participants. All fistulas were successfully isolated with a barrier ring, sponge and ostomy bag (figure 1).
Figure 1. 1a. EAF model. Note exposed loop of sigmoid colon 1b. EAF model demonstrating methylene blue saline efflux. 1c. EAF model with NPT and ostomy appliance. Note cannula containing methylene blue tinted normal saline.
Conclusion:
We developed a cadaver-based EAF model for NPT training. This model could potentially impact practice by allowing all members of the surgical team to improve their application techniques. We acknowledge limitations to the model such as lack of pre- and post- course comparison and need for competency evaluation. Another limitation to the model could be its standardized implementation as a training system due to the costs and need for laboratory facilities. Future aims include further evaluation of the model’s impact on participant’s competence and confidence.
