103.10 Malnutrition in Vascular Surgery Patients: Looking Beyond Serologic Markers

J. Miranda1, H. Younes1, L. Le1, L. Probstfeld2, J. Braun1, N. Barshes1, P. Kougias1, H. S. Tran Cao1  1Baylor College Of Medicine,Surgery,Houston, TX, USA 2Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center,Nutrition,Houston, TX, USA

Introduction:   Malnutrition is a known risk factor for poor wound healing and surgical wound infections, especially important clinical outcomes for vascular surgery patients.  In 2012, leading dietetic organizations issued a consensus definition of clinical malnutrition based on 6 clinical parameters (AND/ASPEN criteria).  We sought to assess the incidence of malnutrition for vascular surgery patients using this definition compared to serologic markers commonly used as indicators.

Methods:   This is a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing elective vascular surgical procedures at a single institution (2015-2017) who received malnutritional screening via a comprehensive nutritional program that included AND/ASPEN criteria.  These criteria include weight loss, decreased oral intake, muscle mass loss, loss of subcutaneous fat, fluid accumulation, and decreased hand grip strength.  Per AND/ASPEN guidelines, at least two deficits must be met to establish a diagnosis of malnutrition.  Correlation with serologic markers was measured.

Results:  Among 65 patients admitted for elective vascular procedures who received a comprehensive nutritional screening by a trained dietitian, 16 (24.6%) did not meet criteria for malnutrition, 21 (32.3%) were moderately malnourished, 11 (16.9%) were severely malnourished, and 17 (26.2%) were not fully assessed due to missing anthropometric data or key elements of the history and physical examination.  Although serum albumin was higher among non-malnourished patients than moderately and severely malnourished patients (3.12 ± 0.64 vs. 3.04 ± 0.51 vs. 2.71 ± 0.68, respectively, p=0.202), this difference failed to reach significance.  Moreover, 10/21 (47.6%) of moderately and 3/11 (27.3%) of severely malnourished patients had serum albumin > 3.0 g/dL, a cut-off often used to represent malnutrition.  Serum prealbumin was not routinely obtained, but was likewise non-discriminatory in detecting clinical malnutrition (e.g. exceeding 18 mg/dL in malnourished patients by AND/ASPEN criteria).  In turn, no surgical site infection was encountered in the clinically non-malnourished cohort, compared to 3 detected in clinically malnourished patients, including one without hypoalbuminemia.

Conclusion:  The prevalence of clinical malnutrition is significant among vascular surgery patients, and may not be fully appreciated with serologic markers alone.  As malnutrition may be a modifiable preoperative risk factor, efforts to comprehensively screen for this condition relying on a combination of clinical and serologic markers may be beneficial.