61.16 Utility of the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant in Alcoholic Hepatitis

Y. Liang1, L. DeGregorio1, M. MacConmara1, C. Hwang1  1University Of Texas Southwestern Medical Center,Department Of Surgery, Division Of Surgical Transplantation,Dallas, TX, USA

Introduction:  Although liver transplantation has become standard therapy for cirrhosis due to alcohol use, it remains a controversial practice for treating severe alcoholic hepatitis. The Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment Tool for Transplant (SIPAT) is a tool used in the psychosocial assessment of potential liver transplant recipients, where a lower score is correlated with improving candidacy for transplantation. We sought to examine medication compliance in relation to SIPAT score in a small cohort of liver transplant recipients who were transplanted for severe alcoholic hepatitis.

Methods:  A retrospective study was conducted between January 2015 to August 2019 to identify recipients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for either alcohol-related cirrhosis or severe alcoholic hepatitis. SIPAT scores and serum tacrolimus levels were extracted from electronic medical records. The standard deviation in serum tacrolimus levels at one-, three-, and six-months were calculated.  

Results: Nine patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis received orthotopic liver transplantation. Three of the nine patients did not receive a SIPAT score due to urgent evaluation. Compliance was assessed by variation in tacrolimus levels.  Compared to alcohol-related cirrhosis, recipients with alcoholic hepatitis had higher median and mean SIPAT scores but had lower median and mean variability (in SD, ng/mL) in tacrolimus levels at one-, three-, and six-months post-transplant. Variability in tacrolimus levels in those who did not receive a SIPAT evaluation were similar to those of alcohol-related cirrhosis. 

Conclusion: Despite the reservation surrounding patients with alcoholic hepatitis receiving a liver transplantation, this small, retrospective cohort study from a single institution showed that their compliance during six-month follow up has been stable despite their higher SIPAT scores at time of evaluation.