05.10 Surgery is Associated with Longer Survival for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Compared to Chemotherapy

K. Landa1, N. E. Farrow1, C. Rushing1, D. Niedzwiecki1, M. Cerullo1, R. Schmitz1, G. Herbert1, K. Shah1, S. Zani1, D. G. Blazer1, P. Allen1, M. Lidsky1 1Duke University Medical Center,Surgery,Durham, NC, USA

Introduction:  Resectable pancreatic cancer is best treated with surgical resection (SR) and multiagent chemotherapy (MCT); however, many patients only complete a single modality due to treatment-related complications or disease progression. We aim to determine whether SR or MCT is associated with superior long-term survival for patients receiving single-modality therapy.

Methods:  Patients with stage I-IIb pancreatic head adenocarcinoma who received either MCT (+/- radiation) or SR (pancreaticoduodenectomy/total pancreatectomy) alone were identified in the National Cancer Database (2013-2015). Patients who received single agent chemotherapy or had an unknown treatment status were excluded. Following a piecewise approach to estimating hazards over the course of follow-up, conditional overall survival (OS) at 30, 60, and 90 days after treatment initiation was estimated using landmark analyses. 

Results: Of 5,146 eligible patients, 3,103 received MCT alone (60.3%) and 2,043 underwent SR alone (39.7%). SR had an OS disadvantage at 30 (HR 3.99, 95% CI 3.12-5.11) and 60 days (HR 1.85, 95% CI 1.4-2.45), but an OS advantage after 90 days (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.55-0.64). In a landmark analysis conditioned on 90 days survival post treatment initiation (Figure), median OS was improved for SR (17.0 vs. 12.2 months, log-rank p<.0001); SR improved OS at 1 (+4.5%), 2 (+20.4%), 3 (+21.3%), and 4 (+15.3%) years (p<.05 for each difference), despite patients being older (median age 72 vs. 67 years, p<.0001) with higher Charlson-Deyo comorbidity scores (≥2: 11.2 vs. 8.6%, p=0.006).

Conclusion: For patients with resectable pancreatic cancer receiving single-modality treatment, SR was associated with superior long-term survival compared to MCT, supporting a role for upfront surgery in this population, especially those at risk of receiving a single therapy.