60.23 Effects of Single Versus Double Lung Retransplantation on Mortality

O. Follis1, M. Kashem1,2, H. Kehara1,2, R. Yanagida1,2, K. Krishan1,2, E. Leotta1,2, N. Shigemura1,2, Y. Toyoda1,2  1Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA 2Temple University Hospital, Cardiothoracic Surgery, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Introduction:
The prevalence of lung allograft rejection after transplant within the first year is approximately 30%. The only viable option for chronic lung allograft rejection after exhausting all medical treatment is lung retransplantation (Re-Ltx), which makes up a small fraction of total annual lung transplants (Ltx). Little research exists comparing mortality rates in single vs double Re-Ltx. We investigated whether single or double Re-Ltx along with laterality of lung transplantation yielded better survival outcomes.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed 1,110 Ltx performed at our medical center from February 2012 – June 2023. All cases that did not include Re-Ltx were excluded resulting in 33 Re-Ltx. Of these 33 cases, one patient was excluded due to combined heart lung transplant, resulting in 32 Re-Ltx patients. The 32 patients were further subdivided into single or double Re-Ltx and laterality was noted as ipsilateral and contralateral Ltx. Kaplan Meier survival analysis, multi-variate cox regression including hazard ratio and confidence interval of 95% were performed using JMP Pro 17. A p-value<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results:
Of the 32 patients, 13 were female: White-28, Hispanic-2, African American-2; mean age 57 ± 13; mean BMI 25 ± 4 kg/m2; mean height 66 ± 4 inches. Intraoperatively 2 patients received VV ECMO, 6 patients VA ECMO, 19 off –pump, and 5 patients underwent cardiopulmonary bypass for surgical procedures. 24 patients received a single Re-Ltx and 8 received a double Re-Ltx. Kaplan Meier survival curve at 3-year post Re-Ltx revealed no significant difference between single vs double Re-Ltx (p = 0.661). When multivariable cox was performed, similar results were shown. Among patients who received a single Re-Ltx there were: 9 contralateral, 2 ipsilateral and 12 single lung from previously done double Ltx. Total deaths among the single Re-Ltx were: 2 ipsilateral, 4 contralateral, 6 single from previously done double Ltx. There were 3 deaths among the double Re-Ltx. Kaplan Meier curve at 3-year analysis post Re-Ltx revealed no significant difference between laterality of Re-Ltx (p=0.941) and verified by multi-variable cox regression.

Conclusion:
In a single center study, single Re-Ltx from previously done double Ltx showed no survival difference within 3 years of retransplantation. More patients died who received a single Re-Ltx from previously done double Ltx (n=6) than those who received a double Re-Ltx (n=3). Still, single ipsilateral or contralateral re-lung transplantation in previously done double lung transplantation may be beneficial in a selected patient. Further multicenter study involving lung retransplantation patients is warranted.