47.04 Regional Differences in Thyroidectomy Volume Patterns across the United States

M. Kheng1, A. Manzella1, A.M. Laird1,2, T. Beninato1,2  1Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, General Surgery, New Brunswick, NJ, USA 2Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Section Of Endocrine Surgery, New Brunswick, NJ, USA

Introduction: Significant disparities exist in access to high-volume endocrine surgeons across the United States. Regional differences, however, have not been well-characterized; in this study we investigated thyroidectomy volume patterns and complication rates across the country.

Methods:  We queried the Vizient Clinical Data Base for patients who underwent either thyroid lobectomy or total thyroidectomy for both benign and malignant disease from 2013-2021. Surgeons with 4+ years of operative data were grouped based on average annual thyroidectomy volume into low (1-24 cases), medium (25-49 cases), high (50-99 cases), and very high volume (100+ cases). States were categorized into eight divisions: New England, Mideast, Great Lakes, Plains, Southeast, Southwest, Rocky Mountains, and Far West.

Results: In total, 295,154 operations were performed by 3,013 surgeons. Average annual case volumes ranged from 1-452 cases. The greatest number of operations were performed on patients living in the Southeast (23.6%), followed by Mideast (20.5%), Great Lakes (18.8%), Far West (11.3%), New England (8.8%), Plains (7.4%), Southwest (7.2%), and Rocky Mountains (2.4%) (p<0.001). Low-volume surgeons performed the majority of cases in all regions, ranging from 23.5% of cases in New England to 44.0% in the Rocky Mountains (p<0.001). The proportion of cases performed by high-volume surgeons ranged from 17.1% in the Southwest to 35.2% in the Southeast.

Very-high volume surgeons performed the largest proportion of operations in New England (35.0%) and the fewest in the Rocky Mountains (0.7%). Collectively, high and very high volume surgeons performed 51.7-59.7% of cases in the Southeast, Mideast, and New England. Conversely, they performed 28.3-39.1% of cases in the Rocky Mountains, Southwest, and Plains. Nationally, complication rates were highest for low-volume surgeons (2.2%), followed by medium-volume (1.4%) and high-volume surgeons (1.3%); very high-volume surgeons had the lowest rates (0.2%) (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Across the United States, the majority of thyroidectomies continue to be performed by low-volume surgeons. However, significant regional differences exist, with a greater proportion of patients in the Eastern regions of the country receiving surgical care from higher-volume surgeons. Disparities in access to high-volume surgeons may translate to differences in perioperative outcomes for patients undergoing thyroidectomy.