A. Fiedler1, C. Walsh1, G. Tolis1, G. Vlahakes1, T. MacGillivray1, T. Sundt1, S. Melnitchouk1 1Massachusetts General Hospital,Cardiac Surgery,Boston, MA, USA
Introduction: Some practitioners routinely place an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) preoperatively in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) such as those with significant left main (LM) disease identified in the setting of acute coronary syndrome. Their value in the current era with increasing burden of comorbid conditions including peripheral vascular disease, however, has not been examined.
Methods: We identified 495 patients presenting with significant LM disease (≥ 50%) and acute coronary syndrome undergoing CABG between January 2002 and April 2014 using our institutional prospective cardiac surgery database. Of these, 198 patients had an IABP placed preoperatively (IABP group) while the other 297 did not (No-IABP group). Operative mortality (30-day or in-hospital) and major complications were compared unadjusted and after adjustment using propensity score based on 25 pre-specified variables.
Results: The IABP group patients had significantly worse baseline clinical profiles with higher rates of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (12.0% vs. 3.2%), critical status (15.3% vs. 3.5%), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (50.2±15.3% vs. 57.9±13.1%), but had superior renal function (all P values<0.01) compared with those in the No-IABP group. As might be expected, unadjusted operative mortality rates were significantly higher in IABP group (8.8% and 3.2% in P=0.006) as were major complications (cardiac arrest, need for mechanical support, neurologic injuries, requirement for dialysis, limb ischemia, multi-organ failure, pneumonia and pulmonary thromboembolism; 26.9% (58/216) vs. 14.83% (47/317); P=0.001) as compared with No-IABP group. With propensity score matching, however, 109 pairs of patients well balanced with regard to all the baseline variables (P values, 0.27-0.99) were identified. In this matched cohort, the IABP group still had a higher operative mortality (odds ratio [OR], 3.52; 95% CI, 0.95-13.14; P=0.060) and rate of major complications (odds ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.00-3.39; P=0.050) compared with the No-IABP group. The increased risk of mortality and morbidity were validated by propensity-adjustment models and inverse-probability-treatment weighting. Higher rates of major complication by the IABP usage were mainly derived by increased risks of renal failure, limbs ischemia and multi-organ failure. Although there may have been an impact of unmeasured covariates unaccounted for in the matching scheme, the nature of the increased morbidity is consistent with known complications of IABP.
Conclusion: Preoperative use of IABP in patients with significant LM disease in the setting of acute coronary syndrome did not reduce 30-day mortality following CABG, but was associated with greater morbidity. Circumspection in the prophylactic use of IABP in this clinical setting may be advisable.