Y. Yatabe1, k. Ikeda1 1Ichihara Hospital,Dept. Of Orthop. Surg.,Tsukuba, IBARAKI, Japan
?Background and Purpose? To date, academic medical society was responsible for certifying its members as specialists in their respective fields; however, the Japanese Medical Speciality Board has now been established, and it was decided that it would handle specialist certification. Meanwhile, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) has been training specialists for over 30 years. This study examined the current situation of orthopedic surgeons in comparison with other specialists. ?Methods? In August 2016, we examined the number of existing academic societies and specialists, with respect to 18 basic areas of medicine requiring specialists, according to the guidelines of the Japanese Medical Speciality Board, and compared the information. ?Results? The number of members with respect to the 18 basic areas of the Japanese Medical Speciality Board was 3,032 to 108,232 (average: 18,597.1), the number of specialists was 666 to 21, 275 (average: 8,567.4), and the acquisition rate was 14.0% to 79.7% (average: 56.0%). Meanwhile, JOA had 24,443 members and 18,489 specialists, with 79.7% of the members having acquired a specialist designation. ?Discussion? It is estimated that the demand for orthopedic medical treatment will increase at an exponential rate in Japan, which is amassing a super-aged society unparalleled elsewhere in the world. To do this, an orthopedic surgeon who understands diseases related to exerciser disease, and who has high level of practical ability, is indispensable. Currently, the number of members, the number of specialists, and the acquisition rate in academic societies exceed the average specified according to the 18 basic regions. Among them, for the specialist acquisition rate, about 80% of the total number of members of the JOA have acquired a specialist designation, the highest acquisition rate among the basic 18 areas put forth by the Japanese Medical Speciality Board. In the future, it is considered necessary to maintain the current number of specialists during the transition to following the specialist guidelines of the Japanese Medical Speciality Board. ?Conclusion? In order to improve orthopedic practice in Japan, it seems necessary to maintain the current number of orthopedic specialists.