G. Wallace1, E. Quiroga1, N. Tran1 1University Of Washington,Vascular Surgery,Seattle, WA, USA
Introduction: Ankle brachial index (ABI) is a reliable quantitative determination of extremity perfusion but required specialized training and could cause patient’s discomfort or not feasible in trauma patients with mangled extremities. Smart phone based thermal imaging utilizing forward looking infrared imaging (FLIR) can easily determine temperature of the extremity. This study reports on the feasibility of using smart phone based FLIR to assess peripheral perfusion by measurement of extremity temperature.
Methods: Patients seen in a vascular clinic with ABI’s measured by an ICAVL certified vascular lab were selected. Patients then underwent imaging using a smart phone based FLIR. Color spectrograph was taken and surface temperature of each extremity was determined and recorded. A single operator who was blinded to ABI’s results obtained all images. Comparison between ABI and extremity’s temperature was performed. Thermal ankle brachial index (TABI) was calculated by dividing the temperature of the lower extremity by that of the upper extremity. Temperature accuracy of FLIR was determined against known standard. Statistical analysis was done using Pearson’s correlation and Bland-Altman plot.
Results: 23 patients had both ABI and extremity temperature recorded on the same day resulting in 45 lower extremities analyzed (one patient has a BKA). ABI ranged from 0.33 to 1.46 with mean (IQR) of 0.92 (0.35). Lower extremity temperature ranged from 60.67 to 96.87°F with mean of 83.41 (14.10). Upper extremity range was 81.86 to 94.60°F with mean of 91.03 (3.44). Positive correlation between ABI and FLIR temperature was seen with Pearson’s correlation coefficient r = 0.66 p = .001, n = 45. Using ABI and the newly described TABI, positive correlation was also seen with r = 0.83, p < .0001, n = 45 (Fig 1). Thermal sensitivity of FLIR was determined at 0.18°F. When comparing against known standard, thermal imaging has an average of 3.16% error across temperature range of 34 to 144°F.
Conclusion: Smart phone based FLIR imaging can be used to reliably determine extremity perfusion as an alternative to traditional ABI measurement. FLIR can be easily done, portable, and has a variety of potential applications from intraoperative assessment of revascularization to evaluation of the injured extremity in trauma.