G. Tominaga2, J. Schulz3, R. Barbosa4,5, S. Agarwal5, G. Utter6, N. McQuay7, C. Brown8, M. Crandall1 1University Of Florida,Surgery,Jacksonville, FL, USA 2Scripps Memorial Hospital,Surgery,La Jolla, CA, USA 3Massachusetts General Hospital,Boston, MA, USA 4Pacific Surgical P.C.,Portland, OR, USA 5University Of Wisconsin,Surgery,Madison, WI, USA 6University Of California – Davis,Surgery,Sacramento, CA, USA 7Johns Hopkins University School Of Medicine,Surgery,Baltimore, MD, USA 8University Medical Center Brackenridge,Surgery,Austin, TX, USA
Introduction: Consistent grading of Emergency General Surgery (EGS) diseases is important for comparison of outcomes and development of EGS registries. The American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Patient Assessment Committee has previously developed a grading system for measuring anatomic severity of 16 inflammatory/infectious EGS diseases. The purpose of this project was to develop a uniform grading template for hemorrhagic EGS diseases cared for by acute care surgeons and apply the template to common hemorrhagic EGS diseases.
Methods: The AAST Patient Assessment Committee reviewed the literature and examined the existing grading systems available for common hemorrhagic EGS diseases. A uniform grading template for EGS diseases was formulated and applied to four common EGS bleeding diseases: bleeding esophageal varices (EV), hemorrhage from colonic diverticulosis (CD), bleeding peptic ulcer disease (PUD), and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).
Results: A grading template was created with Grade I – occult hemorrhage, Grade II – minimal hemorrhage with no active bleeding, Grade III – limited hemorrhage with no active bleeding, Grade IV – moderate hemorrahge with active bleeding, and Grade V – large volume hemorrhage. The template was applied to four hemorrhagic EGS diseases as noted in the table.
Conclusion: We have developed a grading template for hemorrhagic EGS diseases and have applied them to four hemorrhagic diseases commonly managed by acute care surgeons. We believe that physiologic parameters, volume loss, and rate of bleeding are essential co-determinants of outcomes in hemorrhagic conditions. However, adding to this an understanding of the anatomic progression of disease may help inform treatment decisions and predict outcomes.