R. J. Vandewalle1, A. K. Bagwell1, J. R. Shields2, R. C. Burns1, B. P. Brown2, M. P. Landman1 2Indiana University School Of Medicine,Department Of Radiology Division Of Pediatric Radiology,Indianapolis, IN, USA 1Indiana University School Of Medicine,Department Of General Surgery, Division Of Pediatric Surgery,Indianapolis, IN, USA
Introduction:
Pediatric patients with small bowel-to-small bowel intussusception (SBI) found on radiographic work up for abdominal pain or other indications can create a diagnostic dilemma. While the majority of SBI found on imaging have no clinical significance, a small proportion may require surgical intervention. Radiographic and clinical factors predicting the need for operative management of these patients remain poorly defined.
Methods:
A comprehensive database from a tertiary pediatric hospital was reviewed from 1/1/2011 to 12/31/2016 for any radiographic study mentioning intussusception. Patients were included if they had only SBI (i.e. not ileo-colic intussusception) and SBI due to enteral feeding tubes were excluded. The electronic medical records for these patients were reviewed for clinical presentation variables, radiographic data (ultrasound or computed tomography), need for operative intervention, and identification of SBI at the time of surgery.
Results:
142 patients were included in the study and 133 had radiographic data available for review. Of these patients, 18 underwent surgical exploration (18/142: 12.7%) and 11 were found to have an intussusception at the time of surgery (11/142: 7.7%). All patients that had operative intervention had radiographic data available for review. Univariate analyses found a significant positive correlation between longer duration of pain at the time of presentation (3.5 vs. 1 days [IQR: 1-4 vs. 1.5-6]; p=0.047) and the presence of localized abdominal pain (OR: 12.1 [CI: 1.463-99.8]; p=0.004) for having an SBI found at the time of surgery. The positive and negative predictive values for presence of localized pain for intussusception at the time of surgery were 14.5% and 98.6%, respectively. SBI identified at the time of surgery were longer (7.1 vs. 2.2cm; p=0.03), greater in overall diameter (3.0 vs. 1.7cm) and greater in bowel wall thickness (6.5 vs. 4mm; p=0.02) versus those SBI treated non-operatively or found to be spontaneously reduced at the time of surgery. Reciever operating characteristic curves cut-offs for these variables maximized Youden's index at 5.8cm, 2.4cm, and 5.5mm, respectively. Additional significant secondary radiographic findings included the presence of fat-stranding, bowel dilation proximal to the SBI, and the presence of lymphadenopathy.
Conclusion:
SBI is generally a self-limited phenomenon that does not require operative intervention. The absence of localized abdominal pain suggests surgical intervention is not necessary, whereas prolonged duration of pain suggests surgical intervention may be required. Additionally, several radiographic features exist which predict the need for operative intervention.