R. Mallick1, A. Asban2, T. Wang2, H. Chen2, L. Tanner2, V. Strickland2 1University Of Pittsburgh,Department Of Surgery,Pittsburgh, PA, USA 2University Of Alabama at Birmingham,Department Of Surgery,Birmingham, Alabama, USA
Introduction: The model of a designated acute care surgery (ACS) program for care of the emergency general surgery patient has arisen in academic centers across the globe, with proponents advocating improved outcomes and more expeditious care for common surgical problems. We adopted this paradigm at our own institution and in this study sought to review our own outcomes and perioperative metrics prior to and following implementation of an ACS service.
Methods: Patients undergoing either laparoscopic appendectomy or open appendectomy for the indication of acute appendicitis were identified by relevant Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and 10 coding and retrospectively reviewed from January 2013- February 2018. From January 2013 – December 2015 patients were treated by a Surgeon-on-call (SOC) model, and from January 2016-February 2018, an Acute Care Surgery (ACS) model was utilized. We reviewed demographic variables including age, race, gender, and insurance type, as well as outcomes including time from admission to the operating room, length of stay, use of outpatient management, and readmission. Student’s t-test was utilized for comparison of means, and chi-square test for multiple variables.
Results: A total of 424 patients were identified, 252 in the SOC group, and 172 in the ACS group. The mean age of the cohort was 38.6 ± 15.8 years, and 49.5% were female. There was no difference in gender, race, insurance type, or use of laparoscopic or open surgery between groups. Patients in the ACS group was slightly older (p =0.016). With respect to time from admission to the operating room, there was no difference between the SOC or ACS model (11.6 ± 14.6 hrs vs. 11.7 ± 15.7 hrs, p = 0.919), nor was there a difference in postoperative length of stay (1.4 ± 1.5 days vs. 1.6 ± 3.5 days, p = 0.870) or readmission rates (6.7% vs. 7.0%, p = 0.926). With respect to outpatient management, the ACS group demonstrated a higher percentage in comparison to the SOC group (67.4% compared to 55.1%, p = 0.04).
Conclusion: Initiation of an ACS service at our hospital did not grossly modify time to surgery, length of stay, or readmission for patients undergoing appendectomy. However, it did appear to correlate with a higher rate of outpatient management.