M. E. Villarreal1, A. Z. Paredes1, A. T. Malik2, S. Strassels1, H. P. Santry1, C. D. Jones2, D. Vazquez1 1Ohio State University,Department Of Surgery, Division Of Trauma, Critical Care And Burn,Columbus, OH, USA 2Ohio State University,Department Of Orthopaedics,Columbus, OH, USA 3Johns Hopkins University School Of Medicine,Department Of Surgery, Division Of Acute Care Surgery,Baltimore, MD, USA
Introduction: Emergency general surgery (EGS) can have a devastating impact and be functionally debilitating even for previously independent patients. We sought to characterize the differences in clinical and perioperative characteristics between previously community dwelling EGS patients who were and were not discharged to skilled nursing facility (SNF) after index hospitalization.
Methods: The ACS-NSQIP database was queried from 2012-2016 for adults, >18 years old, who presented for evaluation from home, as a transfer from an outside hospital or from an outside emergency department and who emergently underwent one of the 7 procedures which account for the most admissions, deaths, complications and inpatient costs within 48 hours of presentation. Patients admitted from SNFs or other long-term care facilities were excluded. Bivariate comparisons were conducted to measure differences in clinical characteristics (e.g. age, number of comorbidities), perioperative characteristics (e.g. operative time, transfusion requirement), and type of intervention (e.g. high risk vs. low risk) between patients discharged to SNF versus home. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine factors associated with discharge to SNF.
Results: Overall, 151,440 patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 43yrs (IQR 29-59). The majority were female (52%), white (72%), and of pre-operative independent functional status (98%). 87% of patients underwent a high-risk operation. The majority of patients (96%) returned home after EGS as opposed to discharge to SNF (4.5%). Patients discharged to SNF were more likely to be >80 years old (37% vs 3.0%), totally dependent (2.0% vs 0.2%) and have an ASA class >II (91% vs 25%) (all p<0.001). Patients discharged to home were more likely to have an operative time between 0-60min (21% vs 62%) and have low-risk surgery (14% vs 5.6%) (both p<0.001). Patients discharged to SNF were 2.5 times and 30 times more likely to be readmitted (14% vs 5.3%) or die (6.2% vs 0.2%) within 30 days, respectively (both p<0.001). On multivariable analysis age >66, presence of comorbidities such as congestive heart failure (OR 1.5, 1.3-1.9) or disseminated cancer (OR 1.3, 1.2 – 1.5), and sepsis (OR 1.3, 1.2-1.4), dirty surgical wound (OR 1.4, 1.2-1.6), operative time >120min (OR 1.78, 1.6-1.9) and any pre-discharge complication (OR 2.7, 2.5-2.9) were predictive of discharge to SNF.
Conclusion: Baseline patient characteristics and complexity of hospital course are associated with discharge to SNF after EGS care for those who were previously community dwellers. Though patients discharged to SNF made up a minority of EGS patients in our cohort, their higher rates of re-admission and other post discharge complications suggest a need for improved discharge planning processes and post-discharge care plans for the sickest EGS patients.