C. Behr1,2,3, A. Hesketh1,2, B. Steinberg1, M. Symons1, S. Soffer1,2,3 1The Feinstein Institute For Medical Research,Manhasset, NY, USA 2Cohen Children’s Medical Center,Division Of Pediatric Surgery,New Hyde Park, NY, USA 3Hofstra North Shore – LIJ School Of Medicine,Hempstead, NY, USA
Introduction:
Ewing Sarcoma (ES) is an aggressive childhood solid tumor in which 30% of cases are metastatic at presentation, and subsequently carry a poor prognosis. We have previously shown that treatment with the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib significantly reduces invasion and metastasis of ES cells in a COX-2 independent fashion, suggesting that an off-target of celecoxib is likely responsible for this effect. Celecoxib is known to downregulate beta-catenin independently of COX-2, and beta-catenin upregulation is considered a poor prognostic sign in a host of metastatic and aggressive human cancers. Thus we hypothesized that celecoxib’s antimetastatic effect in ES acts via modulation of the beta-catenin signaling pathway.
Methods:
Human ES cells (SK-NEP1) were transfected with siRNA oligomers targeting beta-catenin. Non-targeting siRNAs were used as controls. Knockdown was verified using western blotting. A portion of the samples were also treated with celecoxib. An in vitro invasion assay was performed using standard Boyden chambers by layering a suspension of ES cells within basement membrane extract. After 72 hours, cells were fixed in the wells and stained with crystal violet. The number of invading cells was assessed using light microscopy. Non-transfected SK-NEP1 cells were additionally treated with celecoxib, and beta-catenin levels and activity were assessed using western blotting, qPCR, and immunocytochemistry.
Results:
Reduction of beta-catenin by at least 75% with two different beta-catenin siRNA oligomers did not reduce the ability of the cells to invade compared to their siRNA negative controls (mean of 161 and 176 cells invaded respectively for each siRNA oligomer versus 153 for the non-targeting siRNA control). As expected from our previous experiments, treatment with celecoxib resulted in decreased invasion and this effect was not dependent on the presence of beta-catenin in the cells. Furthermore, western blotting and qPCR failed to demonstrate any difference in beta-catenin protein and RNA levels within the cells after celecoxib treatment, and immunocytochemistry showed no change in the gross amount of beta-catenin nor in its cellular location compared to untreated tumor cells.
Conclusion:
Celecoxib’s inhibition of Ewing Sarcoma invasion is independent of beta-catenin signaling. Decreasing beta-catenin levels in SK-NEP1 cells does not affect their ability to invade, ruling out beta-catenin as a potential mediator of celecoxib’s anti-metastatic properties. Another COX-2 independent target is likely responsible for celecoxib’s anti-metastatic effect.