M. B. Malas1, I. J. Arhuidese1, T. Obeid1, U. Qazi1, C. Abularrage1, I. Botchey1, J. H. Black1, T. Reifsnyder1 1Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions,Department Of Surgery, Division Of Vascular Surgery,Baltimore, MD, USA
Introduction: The protective effect of obesity on survival of patients undergoing hemodialysis for end stage renal disease; described as the obesity paradox has previously been established. Increased survival benefits have also been ascribed to permanent modes of hemodialysis access (fistula/graft) compared to catheter at first hemodialysis. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of incident hemodialysis access type on the obesity paradox.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients with end stage renal disease in the United States Renal Database System, who initiated hemodialysis between 2006 and 2010 without prior renal replacement therapy. Relative mortality within categories of body mass index (BMI) as well as modes of hemodialysis access (fistula/graft Vs catheter) was quantified using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models. Multivariable logistic regression was employed to compare vascular access utilization between the BMI categories. Interaction terms were employed to assess the modifier effect of hemodialysis access type on the association between BMI and survival.
Results: There were 510,000 dialysis initiates in the study cohort; 83% via catheter, 14% via fistula and 3% via grafts. Mortality was significantly lower for patients initiating hemodialysis with permanent forms of access compared to catheter (aHR 0.68, 95%CI 0.67-0.69, P value<0.001). Higher BMI categories were associated with lower mortality as shown in Table 1. Patients in the higher BMI categories were also more likely to initiate hemodialysis via permanent modes of access. Table 1. The interaction term for the modifier effect of vascular access method on the association between BMI and mortality was significant (P<0.001).
Conclusion: We have shown that the highly popularized protective effect of increased BMI on survival in hemodialysis patients is significantly influenced by the method of hemodialysis access. Thus, the obesity paradox is in part accounted for by hemodialysis access type. There is greater use of catheters with their attendant complications and higher mortality amongst patients in the lower BMI categories compared to patients in higher BMI categories. There remains a critical need to increase permanent access utilization at incident hemodialysis so as to improve survival outcomes irrespective of BMI status.