47.14 Decision Making in Advanced Surgical Illness: The Surgeons Perspective in Shared Decision Making

R. S. Morris1, J. Ruck2, A. Conca-Cheng2, T. Smith2, T. Carver1, F. Johnston2  1Medical College Of Wisconsin,Surgery,Milwaukee, WI, USA 2Johns Hopkins University School Of Medicine,Surgery,Baltimore, MD, USA

Introduction:  While surgical patients increasingly have more comorbid disorders and older age, surgeons face difficult decisions in emergent situations. Little is known about surgeon perceptions on the shared decision making process in these urgent settings.

Methods:  Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with practicing surgeons at two large academic medical centers. Thirteen questions and two case vignettes were used to assess participant perceptions, considerations when deciding to offer surgery and communication patterns with patients and families.

Results:Thematic analysis revealed six major themes and numerous subthemes related to end-of-life decision-making for critically ill patients: responsibility for the decision to operate, futility, surgeon judgment, surgeon introspection, pressure to operate and costs of surgery. Futility was universally reported as a contraindication to surgical intervention. However, an inability to definitively declare futility led some participants to emphasize patient self-determined risk-benefit analysis to determine whether to proceed with surgical intervention. Other participants who felt their gestalt about futility was reliable described greater comfort communicating to a patient that their condition was not amenable to surgery and reserved the right to refuse surgical intervention. Most participants desire objective metrics to determine risk and futility in order to more clearly communicate with patients and families, and perhaps temper the pressure to operate from external sources. 

Conclusion:Due to external pressures and uncertainty, some providers err on the side of continuing care despite suspected futility. Surgeons with greater experience and those who report more institutional support of their decisions are often more able to withstand external pressures, feel confident in their assessments of futility, and guide patients and their families away from futile interventions. Greater support from colleagues, institutional culture, research literature, and objective measures of futility can support surgeons in shared decision making and providing the best care for their patients. 

 

47.15 Provider Attitudes and Methods of Preoperative Surgical Risk Assessment

H. Qiu1, M. Bronsert1,2, L. A. Crane3, R. A. Meguid1,4  1University Of Colorado School Of Medicine,Surgical Outcomes And Applied Research Program,Aurora, CO, USA 2University Of Colorado School Of Medicine,Adult And Child Consortium For Health Outcomes Research And Delivery Science,Aurora, CO, USA 3University Of Colorado Denver School Of Public Health,Department Of Community And Behavioral Health,Aurora, CO, USA 4University Of Colorado School Of Medicine,Department Of Surgery,Aurora, CO, USA

Introduction:

Preoperative surgical risk assessment is a critical aspect of surgical decision making. However, techniques employed by surgical team members vary from sole reliance on clinical experience to use of formal risk analysis tools. We aim to better understand the prevalence of and barriers to the use of formal preoperative surgical risk analysis tools.

 

Methods:

A 20-question survey was designed, piloted in 10 surgical and anesthesia providers, and refined before administration. The web-based survey was disseminated via email and in person at a single academic hospital to surgical and anesthesiology staff and residents. A total of 12 questions were on risk assessment attitudes and techniques and 8 were on demographics (Figure 1). Results were analyzed with descriptive statistics (Chi-square or Fisher’s exact p value).

 

Results:

We administered the survey to a convenience sample of 50 surgical and anesthesia providers. Despite 88% of those surveyed reporting the importance of preoperative risk assessment as very or critically important (p<0.001) and 80% of those surveyed reporting discussion of risk preoperatively either most or all of the time (p<0.0001), only 76% of practitioners spend between 0-9 minutes communicating risk preoperatively, and 46% spend 0-4 minutes (p<0.001). When asked about use of 4 formal risk analysis tools, 64-94% of practitioners never use them (p<0.0001). On the contrary, prior experience is reported mostly or always to be a source of preoperative risk assessment (90% surveyed, p<0.0001). Survey of barriers preventing use of formal risk analysis tools identified 4 significant findings: time, electronic health record integration, inaccessibility during patient visit, and trust of accuracy were all reported as moderate to significant barriers by 94%, 74%, 88%, and 80% of respondents, respectively (all p-values <0.001).

 

Conclusion:

Although the prevalence of preoperative risk discussion is high, usage of formal risk analysis tools are infrequent and non-uniform amongst providers. The majority of practitioners relied on prior experience alone for preoperative risk evaluation. Statistically significant barriers against use of formal risk analysis tools include lack of time, lack of electronic health record integration, inaccessibility during patient visit, and lack of trust of tool accuracy. Given the data collected, we conclude there is limited use and significant barriers to use of formal preoperative risk analysis tools, and that time spent discussing surgical risks preoperatively is low despite the importance placed on it by surgical providers. Methods to surpass these barriers might increase the use of formal preoperative risk analysis tools.

47.12 Pediatric Thyroidectomy and Neck Dissection for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review

A. L. Madenci1, R. W. Frank2, B. C. Stack2, J. J. Shin1  1Brigham And Women’s Hospital,Boston, MA, USA 2University Of Arkansas,Little Rock, AR, USA

Introduction: The appropriate extent of thyroidectomy and lymph node dissection (LND) for children with well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma (WDTC) remains unclear. Management strategies may differ from those for adults. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate if children with WDTC have different survival, recurrence, or complication rates based on extent of thyroid resection and neck dissection.

Methods: We performed a computerized search of MEDLINE and Embase from 1966 to August 2017, supplemented with manual searches. Inclusion criteria were studies of patients diagnosed with WDTC at age <21 years, which evaluated thyroid resection and/or LND. Independent reviewers extracted data, with outcomes of survival, recurrence, postoperative complications, study designs, and potential confounders.

Results: Forty-nine criterion-meeting studies included 3821 pediatric patients who underwent resection of WDTC, including total thyroidectomy (TT; n=2512), subtotal thyroidectomy (STT; n=460), and lobectomy (n=725), with some patients undergoing multiple procedures. There were no prospective studies. Among studies comparing TT to STT, none detected a significant difference in overall survival (OS) (0/19 studies, 0%) and one detected a higher DFS after TT (1/12, 8%). Recurrence results were mixed (2/13, 15% detected decreased recurrence after TT; 1/13, 8% detected decreased recurrence after STT), and complications were similar among all studies. Among studies comparing TT to lobectomy, none (0/13, 0%) detected a significant difference in OS, one detected significantly increased DFS after TT (1/7, 14%), two detected significantly decreased recurrence after TT (2/8, 25%), and none (0/2, 0%) detected a significant difference in complications. Comparing STT and lobectomy, none reported a difference in OS (0/6, 0%), DFS (0/4, 0%), recurrence (0/3, 0%), or complications (0/1, 0%). Additionally, 17 studies reported outcomes following LND. Of the two small stage-specific studies limited to N+ patients, neither (0/2, 0%) detected a significant difference in OS or recurrence with LND, compared to no LND. Among 15 studies evaluating LND that were not stage-specific, none reported a difference in OS (0/4, 0%). One (1/5, 20%) study reported a significantly decreased DFS among N+ patients who underwent LND, compared to N0 who did not undergo LND (P<0.001). Recurrence results were mixed: 2/12 (17%) studies reported increased recurrence after LND, 6/12 (50%) reported no difference, and 3/12 (25%) reported decreased recurrence after LND. Two (3/7, 43%) studies documented significantly higher complication rates after LND.

Conclusion: In this systematic review of thyroidectomy and LND for pediatric WDTC, studies were generally underpowered and not stage specific. These retrospective results were mixed with respect to OS, DFS, recurrence, and post-operative complications.

47.09 Specialists’ Obligation to Provide Feedback to Referring Physicians: A Systematic Ethical Analysis

A. G. Antunez2,3, L. Dossett1,2  1Michigan Medicine,Department Of Surgery,Ann Arbor, MI, USA 2Institute For Health Policy And Innovation,Ann Arbor, MI, USA 3University Of Michigan Medical School,Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Introduction:
Surgical specialists are uniquely positioned to identify errors that have occurred during a patient’s diagnosis or treatment prior to referral. Specialists describe significant discomfort and physician and profession-centered barriers to giving feedback to the providers responsible for these errors. This analysis uses an ethical framework grounded in professional values to assess specialists’ obligations to communicate with referring physicians regarding pre-referral errors.

Methods:
We systematically explored the relevant principles from modern professional ethics literature, and applied them to cases where specialists discover the error of a referring physician. We explored these principles in the context of case studies described in previous qualitative work.  

Results:
The traditional, four-principle medical ethics framework (autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice) has been adapted to modern practice in recent writings on professional ethics in medicine. Modern physicians should be accountable to their colleagues, responsible for their patients’ health, continuously improving their practice, allocating care fairly, and utilizing resources appropriately. Using the principles evoked in these modern codes (Figure 1), we demonstrate that providing feedback about pre-referral errors is an ethical behavior and that in order to fully uphold these values, specialist physicians have a duty to provide feedback to referring providers. The process of giving feedback fulfills a physician’s duty in each of these ethical domains, while failing to do so can harm patients, providers, and the profession. 

Conclusion:
Physicians have an ethical obligation to provide feedback after discovering pre-referral errors. This duty can be derived from the multi-faceted code of modern professional medical ethics. With potential negative repercussions for both parties, specialists may find it difficult to fulfill this obligation. Systems-based professionalism may offer a method of making feedback more commonplace, by providing regular opportunities for referring providers and specialists to dialogue. This may alleviate the discomfort or overcome the physician and profession-centered barriers that prevent specialists from acting on their principled inclinations. 
 

47.10 Ethical Considerations in DCIS: The Role of Breast MRI and Subsequent Outcomes.

L. S. Sparber1, A. B. Warman2, W. Doscher1,3,4  1Northwell Health System North Shore LIJ,Division Of Vascular Surgery, Department Of Surgery,New Hyde Park, NY, USA 2Columbia University,School Of Professional Studies Dept Of Bioethics,New York, NY, USA 3Northwell Health System North Shore LIJ,Department Of Medicine, Division Of Ethics,New Hyde Park, NY, USA 4Hofstra University,School Of Medicine,Hempstead, NY, USA

Introduction: Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as a potentially more sensitive imaging modality than traditional mammography, for detecting in situ breast tumors. The question that remains is whether this modality should be universally utilized as all interventions have decisions related to their results?  Quality of life implications and functional outcomes should be considered. It is unclear whether breast MRI has resulted in overtreatment and therefore unnecessary mastectomies in patients with Ductal Carcinoma in situ (DCIS). 

Methods: A comprehensive search for all published clinical studies on the use of MRI and its impact on DCIS management (2010-2017) was conducted using Pub Med and Google Scholar.  The search focused on the value of MRI to guide treatment strategies, including mastectomy rates, the overall benefit of this added imaging modality as well as ethical dilemmas associated with its use.  Keywords searched included: “breast MRI”, “mastectomy”, “DCIS”, “surgical planning” and ethics in all possible combinations.

Results:  Eleven studies involving 3,655 patients have been published. Lallemand et al, reported that routine use of MRI often leads to multiple procedures which have limited benefit. The largest study was reported by Pilewskie et al (2014) involving 2,321 DCIS patients examining loco-regional recurrence. Itakura et al reported increased mastectomy rates in patients undergoing preoperative MRI (p < .001).  In contrast, three studies analyzed the impact of MRI on DCIS mastectomy rates, with Allen et al reporting no significant difference in mastectomy rates if an MRI was performed (p = .62). Pilewskie et al, demonstrated that breast conserving surgery was more successful in the non-MRI group (p = .06), whereas Allen et al and Kropcho et al found the results to not be statistically significant (p = .41 and p = .414, respectively). Doyle et al, reported that use of MRI accurately predicted the extent of DCIS requiring further surgery (p=0.01). All but one study demonstrated that preoperative MRI was not routinely beneficial in DCIS patients.    

Conclusion: Decision making is complex and value-laden in interventions that could lead to body altering procedures. Breast MRI is associated with an increased sensitivity compared to other breast imaging technologies, which may contribute to an increase in unnecessary mastectomies in patients diagnosed with DCIS.  Proportionality, which is the assessment of benefits versus risks, must be considered. Shared decision making between the clinician and the patient is essential in this process. The clinician’s virtue is the source of the principles of non-maleficence and beneficence- both of which aim to honor the patient’s moral status: wanting to help a patient live optimally, while avoiding inflicting harm. Therefore, the issue becomes who decides what is the best medical care for a patient?
 

47.11 Barriers and Enablers to Rural Trauma System Implementation: A Case Study of Hospitals in Scotland

R. D. Adams1, Z. Morrison2, E. Cole1, J. Jansen3  1Queen Mary, University Of London,London, ENGLAND, United Kingdom 2University Of Aberdeen,Aberdeen, SCOTLAND, United Kingdom 3University Of Alabama at Birmingham,Birmingham, Alabama, USA

Introduction: Inclusive trauma systems have been shown to reduce mortality, when compared with exclusive systems. A trauma system is currently being developed in Scotland, a country with large rural areas. However, rural trauma systems face challenges; especially geography and low patient volume. The development of such a rural trauma system is a complex undertaking and understanding the views of service providers will be crucial.

The aim of this study was to conduct an exploratory evaluation, in order to identify key barriers and enablers to the development of an effective trauma system, from the perspective of rural healthcare professionals, to inform the effective implementation of a trauma system.

 

Methods: We undertook an initial scoping study using a qualitative case study research strategy to better understand the perceptions of rural healthcare professionals within a single setting; current trauma services within the North of Scotland due to be integrated into the planned trauma system. The study was conducted across rural general hospitals (RGH) in the North of Scotland, from April to June 2017, using an opportunistic sampling strategy to include hospital-based providers of rural trauma care across the region. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, recorded, and professionally transcribed. Thematic analysis was used to identify and group participant perspectives on the key barriers and enablers to the development of the new trauma system.

 

Results: We conducted 15 interviews with 18 participants (17 doctors and one nurse) across all six RGHs. Participants had a mean of 18 years trauma care experience. 

Study participants described several barriers and enablers, across three themes. The first theme was quality of care and enablers included confidence in basic management, although, a perceived lack of change from current management was seen as a barrier.

The second theme was interfaces with the network, which included enablers, such as, a good interaction with other services and a single point of contact for referral. Barriers included challenges in referring to tertiary care.

The final theme was trauma within the wider healthcare system that included enablers such as an improved transport system, increased audit resource and coordinated clinical training. Barriers perceived were a rural staffing crisis and problematic transfer to further care.

 

Conclusion: This study provides a multifaceted insight into rural healthcare professionals’ perceptions regarding barriers and enablers to implementing a rural trauma system in Scotland. These included practical issues, such as retrieval, transfer and referral processes. More importantly, there appears to show a degree of uncertainty, discontent and disengagement towards system development, and concerns regarding staffing levels and governance. These issues are unlikely to be unique to Scotland and warrant further study to inform service planning and delivery of rural trauma systems.

47.07 Diabetes is Associated with Prolonged Healing in Patients Undergoing Lower Extremity Amputation

K. Saffaf1, G. S. De Silva1, O. Saffaf1, L. A. Sanchez1, M. A. Zayed1,2  1Washington University In St. Louis,Division Of Vascular Surgery,St. Louis, MO, USA 2Veterans Affairs St. Louis Health Care System,Division Of Vascular Surgery,St. Louis, MO, USA

Introduction:

Over 130,000 major lower extremity amputations are performed in the United States each year for critical limb ischemia (CLI), a severe form of peripheral arterial disease characterized by recalcitrant stenosis, tibial artery calcification, and non-healing, non-salvageable wounds.  Unfortunately, many patients will require re-intervention or re-operation due to surgical site necrosis, wound dehiscence, infection, and poor overall healing. Identifying which specific patient characteristics contribute the most to these complications has proven difficult. We aimed to delineate which patient factors contribute to prolonged wound healing times in a cohort of patients undergoing major lower extremity amputation.

Methods:
A cohort of 17 patients (19 limbs) undergoing major lower extremity amputation for CLI at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed following their operation. Post-operative clinical imaging at 2-4 weeks, 4-6 weeks, and 6-8 weeks were scored for wound healing parameters using a modified Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool. Patients with up-trending scores (poor healing) were deemed to be “Prolonged Healers”, whereas patients with lower scores (appropriate healing) were deemed as “Appropriate Healers” over an 8 week period. Descriptive statistics were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test and summarized as mean ± SEM, while categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-square analysis

Results:
Chi-square analysis demonstrated diabetes as the only significant variable between the two groups (Prolonged Healers VS Appropriate Healers) (p=0.026). Other variables including smoking status, presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, etc., demonstrated no significance. There were no differences in age, ASA BMI, ASA, or operative time between the two groups.

Conclusion:
In a small cohort of patients undergoing lower extremity amputation for CLI, we determined that diabetes was significantly associated with prolonged healing times. Other patient specific comorbidities demonstrated no significant association to long-term continuous healing.  Our analysis demonstrates that patients with diabetes should be closely monitored during their post-operative recovery for wound related complications. 
 

47.08 Challenging Ethical Issues in Extremity Amputations: What Role Does a Consult Service Play?

L. S. Sparber1, A. B. Warman2, W. Doscher1,4,5  1Northwell Health System North Shore LIJ,Department Of Surgery, Division Of Vascular Surgery,New Hyde Park, NY, USA 2Columbia University,School Of Professional Studies Dept Of Bioethics,New York, NY, USA 4Northwell Health System North Shore LIJ,Department Of Medicine, Division Of Ethics,New Hyde Park, NY, USA 5Hofstra University,School Of Medicine,Hempstead, NY, USA

Introduction: There is a paucity of published studies that have focused on the role of ethics consultations when patients refuse life saving amputations. Duty based ethics suggest that clinicians guide interventions through proportionality and the duty to the patient to restore health when possible and ease suffering when not. Quality of life implications and functional outcomes should be considered. This pilot study sought to examine the ethical issues that arise when patients facing loss of limb and ultimately life refuse surgical interventions.

Methods: Between July 2009 and June 2016, a retrospective study of all ethics consultations was performed. Demographic and clinical data was collected. There were 1,038 limb amputations performed. Seven patients (0.7%) requiring limb amputations required Ethics consultations. The overall median age was 53 years. Two (28.6%) of the patients were female.  One patient was pediatric. The average length of stay until clinical ethics was consulted was 18.7 days.  Descriptive statistical analysis was utilized to evaluate variations in patient capacity as well as goals of care variations in advanced planning decisions.

Results: The primary outcome was successful mediation of the initial ethical consultation. The time frame from initial consult to surgical intervention was days to months. Of the seven patients, four (57.1%) patients did not have capacity initially. One patient regained capacity. Surgical interventions included below the knee amputation (14.3%); above the knee amputation (28.6%); transmetatarsal amputation (14.3%); debridement (14.3%); multiple limb amputations (28.6%). The secondary outcome was death during incident hospitalization (42.9%).

Conclusion: It is acknowledged that there is a bias towards patients with disabilities, but some may argue that many of the difficulties those with disabilities face are put in place by society at large and are not inherent to their disabilities. What is important is the patient’s perspective of what is good or beneficial for them. The clinician should be able to participate without bias in the shared decision-making process as well as assist the surrogate in the process when the patient does not have capacity.  Treatment considerations should be weighed in light of best interests, benefits, burdens and risk to the patient’s authentic self. The consultation service can assist the team navigate through these ethical concerns. Additional studies are required to validate the findings of this small study.

47.05 Bariatric Surgery Provider Perspectives On Barriers To Severe Obesity Care: A Qualitative Analysis

L. M. Funk1,2, S. A. Jolles1,2, R. L. Gunter2, C. I. Voils1,2  1William S. Middleton VA,Department Of Surgery,Madison, WI, USA 2University Of Wisconsin-Madison,Department Of Surgery,Madison, WI, USA

Background: Nearly 20% of U.S. Veterans are severely obese, yet less than 0.1% undergo the most effective treatment – bariatric surgery. The aim of our study was to assess perceived barriers to severe obesity care among bariatric surgeons and nutritionists who work with bariatric patients.

Methods: We conducted interviews with 16 providers, including 10 bariatric surgeons and 6 registered dieticians (RD) who provide severe obesity care to Veterans. At least two surgeons from each of the five national regions in the VA system participated. RDs were recruited from VA weight management programs in the Great Lakes Health Care System region. Using a semi-structured interview guide, an interviewer asked providers to describe the preoperative and postoperative processes of care and challenges to providing bariatric surgery care within the VA system. All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. A directed approach to content analysis was applied. Emergent themes were identified and finalized through a process of consensus among four coders. Participants also completed a demographic questionnaire upon the completion of each interview.

Results: The mean provider age was 42.1 (SD=9.8) years; 50% were male and 31% were non-white. The average number of years in practice was 13.7 (SD=8.0); 63% had a dual appointment at a University. Five general barriers to care were identified (Table 1): 1) primary care providers not supporting bariatric surgery; 2) difficulty accessing VA bariatric surgery programs; 3) difficulty meeting preoperative requirements (e.g. weight loss and smoking cessation); 4) difficulty coordinating postoperative care; and 5) patient apprehension about making postoperative lifestyle changes. Three facilitators of bariatric surgery care were identified: 1) patient motivation to improve their long-term quality of life; 2) having social support; and 3) utilizing telehealth.   

Conclusion: Educating referring providers about bariatric surgery options, expanding availability of bariatric surgery services, and standardizing preoperative criteria across centers may increase access and improve coordination of bariatric surgery care within the VA. Expanded use of telehealth also appears to support provision of bariatric surgery in the VA. Implementation and dissemination strategies focused on these areas will be key if bariatric surgery provision expands within the VA.     

 

 

 

47.06 Personal Protective Equipment Needs a Redesign for Trauma Setting

P. Martin-Tuite1, L. Chehab2, B. Alpers3, J. Liao4, A. Sammann2  1University Of California – Berkeley / University Of California – San Francisco,Joint Medical Program,Berkeley, CA, USA 2University Of California – San Francisco,San Francisco, CA, USA 3Stanford University,Palo Alto, CA, USA 4George Washington University School Of Medicine And Health Sciences,Washington, DC, USA

Introduction:  Personal protective equipment (PPE) utilization rates are at a decade low across the healthcare industry. The International Safety Center (ISC) has issued a call to action to increase the rates of PPE utilization among healthcare workers at increased risk of occupational exposure, as recent data from the Exposure Prevention Information Network (EPINet) illuminated especially poor compliance among this cohort. While this applies across all health care settings, it is essential in high-risk environments such as level 1 trauma resuscitations, where the possibility of an occupational exposure is extremely high. The aim of this study is to understand the factors influencing poor compliance with PPE at an urban, safety-net teaching hospital and level 1 trauma center.

Methods:  Human-centered design (HCD) is a well-established research methodology in the design community that uses ethnographic, in-context observations and in-depth interviews to understand the challenges and unmet needs facing stakeholders in a system. We used this approach to conduct 50 hours of live observation of trauma care providers. Workflows and workarounds were identified from video recordings of 15 level 1 trauma resuscitations. We also conducted 35 in-depth interviews with stakeholders including nurses, doctors, technicians and students and identified common themes. Usability testing was performed in context to observe a range of users, from novice to experienced providers, don PPE.

Results: Upon review of 15 video recorded trauma resuscitations, we found that adequate PPE compliance (gown, gloves and face shield) at our institution is low at 29.0%. In interviews, stakeholders identified an inability to either locate or retrieve multiple items stored in inaccessible locations and separate packaging. Furthermore, PPE is a barrier to accessing the trauma patient, and providers express concern leaving the room to retrieve PPE. During usability testing, providers took 90 seconds to don PPE and an additional 30 seconds to don high shoe covers. Through live observations and video recordings, we also observed providers exiting and re-entering the room to retrieve PPE, struggle to remove PPE from packaging, or unfold and hand PPE over patients.

Conclusion: Providers report an understanding of the importance of PPE and cite a desire to wear it, but identify accessibility as the greatest challenge. While common approaches to increasing compliance in healthcare and workforce development tend to focus on incentives, education and training, HCD revealed that there is an important need to redesign PPE, as well as its storage and packaging, for the trauma setting. To help trauma providers increase compliance to wearing PPE, we must design it in such a way that allows them to don rapidly in a time-limited environment, and package and store it in a way that does not interfere with provider workflows.

 

47.03 Justifying Our Decisions About Surgical Technique: Evidence from Coaching Conversations

A. E. Kanters1, S. P. Shubeck1, G. Sandhu1, C. C. Greenberg2, J. B. Dimick1  1University Of Michigan,General Surgery,Ann Arbor, MI, USA 2University Of Wisconsin,Madison, WI, USA

Introduction: Although the quality of an operation depends heavily on operative technique, there’s very little evidence illuminating how surgeons arrive at their intraoperative decisions. Surgical training largely follows an apprenticeship model. This model of learning has the potential to perpetuate surgical knowledge grounded in anecdote rather than surgical literature. The objective of this study was to determine the extent to which practicing surgeons justify their technical decisions based on their experience or based on evidence. 

Methods: This qualitative study evaluated 10 video coaching conversations between 20 bariatric surgeons at the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative meeting in October 2015. Using grounded theory approach, the coaching dyads were coded in an iterative process with comparative analysis in order to identify emerging themes. We focused on how participants justified specific surgical techniques and decisions as these topics were a common theme identified in each of the coaching transcripts. 

Results: Three major themes emerged during analysis. (1) Most commonly, we found individuals reported modifications in surgical technique after a particularly negative postoperative complication for a single patient. For example, one surgeon reported, “Why did this leak? I had no reason…so that’s when I started to just say, ‘I’m just going to over sew everybody.’” (2) Alternatively, participants were noted to defend use of certain techniques or surgical decisions based on their perceived expert opinion of others. For example, individual surgeons often refer to how they were trained or how they witnessed another surgeon in the field perform a procedure as their impetus for modifying their own technique. (3) Finally, there was a notable lack of referring to evidence in surgical literature or educational programming as a motivation for changing surgical technique.

Conclusion: In this qualitative analysis of coaching conversations we found that practicing surgeons most often justify their surgical decisions with anecdotal evidence and “lessons learned”, rather than deferring to surgical literature to motivate their behaviors. This either represents a lack of evidence or poor uptake of existing data. 
 

47.04 The Golden Year: How Functional Recovery shapes Tendon Surgery context in Patients with Tetraplegia

C. A. Harris1, M. J. Shauver1, K. C. Chung1  1University Of Michigan,Plastic Surgery, Department Of Surgery,Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Introduction:  Tendon Transfer Surgery can effectively improve hand function for patients with tetraplegia, but remains poorly utilized. Although provider behavior and inconsistent care delivery contribute to low operative rates, there is growing recognition that patients' social and emotional contexts also impact uptake. In particular, evidence suggests that the balance of patients' positive and negative coping behavior can influence their progression to surgery. Yet, how these coping behaviors evolve is not completely understood. This study seeks to probe how patients' early recovery experiences shape their attitudes toward function and identity to impact coping, and ultimately how this shapes their reconstructive context.  

Methods:  We performed a cross-sectional qualitative analysis of nineteen participants with C4-C7 cervical spinal injuries: 9 patients had undergone reconstruction, 10 had not. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using a standardized interview guide focusing on rehabilitation experience, the relationship between function and identity, and how patient experience evolved. Interview transcripts were analyzed using grounded theory methodology and constant comparative analysis. 

Results: The study sample was predominantly male (79%), white (89%), and American Spinal Injury Association Grades A-D were represented. Patients' attitudes toward function were largely shaped by the degree to which they recognized rehabilitation’s necessity, experienced functional gains, and built constructive relationships with their therapists. Poor insurance coverage and financial constraints limited rehabilitation access, and decreased patients' hope for improvement. Function impacted identity through the degree to which it tied participants to a ‘patient’ role. We conceptualized this relationship as two spectra: high vs. low function and strong vs. weak patient identity (Figure 1). Early in recovery (e.g. The Golden Year) patients’ function, roles, and attitudes were fluid, but they solidified over time. How satisfied patients were with these final positions influenced how well they coped.  

Conclusion: This study adds to our understanding of how patients with tetraplegia build their operative contexts. Depicting function and identity as two related axes demonstrates how these domains continually influence each other, while patients' satisfaction with their places on these spectra becomes the starting point for their coping. Our finding that patients eventually established norm based on their solidified function/identity positions suggests that introducing reconstruction during the Golden Year may help prolong patient's receptiveness to surgery. 

47.02 A Qualitative Study of Care Transitions Following Injury in Cameroon

D. C. Dickson1, S. A. Christie1, R. A. Dicker2, A. Chichom-Mefire3, C. Juillard1  1University Of California – San Francisco,Center For Global Surgical Studies,San Francisco, CA, USA 2University Of California – Los Angeles,Los Angeles, CA, USA 3University Of Buea,Department Of Surgery And Obstetrics- Gynecology, Faculty Of Health Sciences,Buea, SOUTHWEST REGION, Cameroon

Introduction:  People living in Cameroon, a lower middle-income country (LMIC), have a higher than average burden of trauma, suffer from more severe injuries, and face substantial barriers to accessing formal health care services. As LMICs improve health infrastructure to care for injury, understanding how patients use and adapt the formal medical system to meet their needs becomes crucial to guide appropriate investments. This study sought to identify and describe how recently injured Cameroonians move within and between formal and informal care systems and what motivates these transitions.

Methods:  Data was collected using semistructured interviews with recently injured people or their adult family members residing in Southwest Region, Cameroon. Participants were recruited from a larger community based survey on injury using stratified purposeful sampling. Interview contents were regularly reviewed to direct further sampling and assess for theoretical saturation. In total, 39 people participated in 34 interviews. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and, as necessary, translated from local Pidgin into English. Transcripts were iteratively coded by two research team members to identify major themes.

Results: Despite often viewing formal medical care as the best source for treatment after injury, participants frequently described mixing and matching formal and informal care types and sources. Few injured participants were treated with formal care exclusively, and the majority who engaged with formal care at any point left before completing treatment. Reasons given for leaving formal care included: (a) anticipated costs beyond means, (b) unacceptable length of proposed treatment, (c) poorly supported referral to a larger hospital, (d) unsatisfactory treatment progress or outcome, and (e) belief that traditional methods work additively with formal care [Figure]. Factors that motivated people to engage or remain engaged with formal care included: (a) perceived high severity of injury (b) desire for reliable diagnostic tests (c) social support during hospitalization, and (d) financial support from family or others.

Conclusion: Although cost was an important consideration, participants described a range of factors that influenced their decisions and treatment course. These results provide specific opportunities to improve engagement in formal care, such as clarifing expectations around treatment costs and outcomes, and improving and streamlining inter-facility referrals. Given the frequent use of informal care sources, options for engaging informal providers to encourage timely referral should also be explored. Such changes would build on existing positive views of formal care to improve outcomes and reduce morbidity.

47.01 An Innovative Approach To Quality Improvement On A Trauma Surgical Service

A. Sammann1, L. Z. Chehab1, A. Sammann1  1University Of California – San Francisco,Department Of Surgery,San Francisco, CA, USA

Introduction:  Trauma patient rounds are complex, with a high volume of complicated patients in a dynamic environment with competing priorities and workflows. This presents challenges to improving quality, care experience, and resource use as single-method research approaches fail to comprehensively understand these complex systems. We combined the commonly used lean methodology with human-centered design (HCD), a methodology that is well-established in the technology and design community but novel to healthcare. We used this mixed methods approach to understand factors contributing to care team dissatisfaction on daily patient rounds at a safety-net teaching hospital and level 1 trauma center.

Methods:  HCD uses ethnographic observations and in-depth interviews to understand the challenges and needs facing users of a system. We performed observations to identify 'work-arounds' and conducted 22 interviews with a cross-section of care team members (physicians, NPs, RNs, pharmacists, fellows, residents, students), hospital administrators (bed control, AOD), patients and families. Using lean, we performed time observations of 15 rounds, tracking activities related to flow and classified them as ‘clinically relevant’ and ‘non-clinically relevant.'

Results: The greatest source of dissatisfaction with rounds was the perceived inefficiency by care team members. Lean time observations confirmed that 34.2% of time was spent on ‘non-clinically relevant’ activities. Teaching was minimal and interruptions and clarifications were frequent which disrupted the flow of rounds. Through HCD we discovered that rounds were populated by 3 different groups of users: advocates (patients and RNs); learners (students and interns); and doers (residents, NPs and physicians). Each group had a different set of needs and expectations, resulting in disagreement over the purpose of rounds. Advocates wanted to share the patient perspective and understand the care plan; learners wanted to be educated and contribute to decision-making; and doers wanted to create a care plan without compromising quality of patient care.

Conclusion: By mixing methods using lean and HCD processes, we are able to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the system- and human-centered factors affecting rounds on a trauma surgical service. The system measures efficiency as a function of work and time, and lean demonstrated that our rounding process was inefficient as much of the time spent was on ‘non-clinically relevant’ work. Humans measure efficiency by the speed with which they can get their needs met. If their needs remain unmet, the experience is inefficient and satisfaction remains low. HCD allowed us to understand these subtleties and to classify the different needs of our user groups. To adequately address complex environments, we need to understand the strains on both the system and its users so that we can create sustainable quality improvement programs.

46.18 NIFTP Reclassification and Its Impact on Thyroid Malignancy Rate and Treatment

M. Mao1, T. Joyal2, O. Picado1, D. Kerr2, J. Lew1, J. Farra1  1University Of Miami Leonard M. Miller School Of Medicine,Division Of Endocrine Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family Department Of Surgery,Miami, FL, USA 2University Of Miami Leonard M. Miller School Of Medicine,Department Of Pathology,Miami, FL, USA

Introduction: The reclassification of a proportion of follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma (FVPTC) to noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) may have significant implications for patients and physicians.  NIFTP may change overall malignancy rates and minimize extent of surgical treatment. This study reviews overall malignancy rate, FNA cytopathology, and treatment of a surgical cohort of patients with a diagnosis of FVPTC reclassified as NIFTP.

Methods: A retrospective review of 847 patients who underwent thyroidectomy at a single institution from January 2010 to April 2016 was performed. Overall rate of thyroid malignancy was determined, and further subdivided into those with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) and its follicular variant. The subgroup with FVPTC (n=181) was re-reviewed by an endocrine pathologist for reclassification to NIFTP. Thirty-five patients were excluded from the analysis due to inability to retrieve the pathology slides (n=22) or the lesion being too small to assess infiltrative pattern (n=13). Further review of patients reclassified as NIFTP was performed for preoperative FNA cytopathology, extent of thyroidectomy, central neck dissection (CND), and postoperative radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment.

Results: Of 847 patients who underwent thyroidectomy, 495 patients had a thyroid cancer, yielding a 58% malignancy rate. The majority were PTC (n= 454, 92%). FVPTC was identified in 181 patients, of which 146 patients underwent pathology re-review for NIFTP. There were 32 cases (22%) reclassified as NIFTP, reducing the overall malignancy rate to 55%. Within the NIFTP cohort, pre-operative FNA cytopathology revealed the following: 3% Bethesda I, 31% Bethesda II, 35% Bethesda III, 19% Bethesda IV, 9% Bethesda V, and 3% Bethesda VI. Overall, 66% of the NIFTP cohort had Bethesda classifications III-VI. Among NIFTP patients, 16 underwent total thyroidectomy and 16 underwent thyroid lobectomy, of which 12 had completion thyroidectomies (75%). Twenty patients (63%) underwent CND, and 9 underwent postoperative RAI treatment (28%). 

Conclusion: A significant proportion of FVPTC patients were reclassified as NIFTP. The implementation of this classification may decrease overall institutional thyroid malignancy rates.  The majority of reclassified NIFTP cases were from Bethesda III-VI categories, which suggests a need to reassess the predicted malignancy rates within the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) categories. When a NIFTP is found on final pathology, surgeons should regard this diagnosis as an indolent tumor requiring no further surgical or medical treatment as these patients have been shown to derive no long term benefit from completion thyroidectomy or RAI.

 

46.19 IS A THYROID NODULE IN A PATIENT WITH GRAVES' DISEASE ASSOCIATED WITH A HIGHER RISK OF CANCER?

H. H. Shi1, C. R. McHenry1,2  1Case Western Reserve University School Of Medicine,Cleveland, OH, USA 2MetroHealth Medical Center,Cleveland, OH, USA

Introduction:  A thyroid nodule in a patient with Graves’ disease has traditionally been thought to have a high risk of malignancy. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of a thyroid nodule in patients with Graves’ disease and the rate of malignancy in patients with a clinically apparent dominant thyroid nodule.

Methods:  A retrospective review of all patients with Graves’ disease who underwent thyroidectomy from 1990-2016 was completed. The number of patients operated on with an associated dominant nodule was determined. Pathology reports were reviewed for documentation of incidental thyroid nodules. Age, sex, nodule size, thyroid uptake and scan, ultrasound findings, and fine needle aspiration biopsy results were determined. Incidental occult papillary microcarcinoma was not considered in the determination of rate of malignancy. Data was analyzed using Student’s t-test and Chi-square test.

Results: There were 218 patients with Graves’ disease who underwent thyroidectomy. 92 (42%) patients had one or more thyroid nodules documented on final pathologic examination of the thyroid gland, including 41 (19%) who had a clinically significant dominant nodule with a mean size of 3.0 ± 2.4 cm that was evaluated preoperatively with fine needled biopsy (n=25; benign 12, AUS 8, follicular neoplasm 3, suspicious for papillary cancer 1 and papillary cancer 1) and/or thyroid scintigraphy (n=18, 16 with a hypo- or isofunctioning nodule).  Patients with a thyroid nodule were older (43 ± 13 yrs vs. 37 ± 11 yrs, p<0.001) and more likely to have an occult papillary microcarcinoma [5 (1%) vs. 1 (1%), p=0.039]. Only 2 (5%) of the 41 patients with a dominant nodule had a clinically significant thyroid cancer.

Conclusion: Thyroid nodules occurred in 42% of patients with Graves’ disease, however, most are incidental and clinically insignificant. Clinically significant nodules were present in 18% with a 5% rate of cancer. Our results show that patients with Graves’ disease and a thyroid nodule do not appear to have a higher rate of thyroid cancer than the general population with a thyroid nodule. 

 

46.20 Parathyroidectomy in Primary vs Secondary/Tertiary Hyperparathyroidism Patients: Different Outcomes?

S. K. Chung1, A. A. Asban1, C. Balentine1, H. Chen1  1University Of Alabama At Birmingham,Department Of Surgery,Birmingham, AL, USA

Introduction:
Surgical treatment is the definitive therapy for primary, secondary and tertiary hyperparathyroidism (HPT). However, each type of hyperparathyroidism has a different etiology and differing patient populations. We hypothesize that despite these differences, parathyroidectomy is equally effective in treating all types of HPT and result in similar outcomes.

Methods:
We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with primary, secondary or tertiary HPT referred for parathyroidectomy to one surgeon at a tertiary care center between November 2015 and June 2017. We used Chi Square test for categorical variables and Student T-test for difference between means to identify differences between the two groups.

Results:
We identified 221 patients with primary (181, 82%), or secondary/tertiary HPT (40, 18%) who underwent parathyroidectomy. The mean ages for patients with primary and secondary/tertiary HPT were 60 years (SD 13.6 ) and 52.5 years (SD 11.7), respectively (p<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in gender: 79% females with primary HPT and 53% females with secondary/tertiary HPT (p=0.001). Racial distribution was also significantly different (p=0.001) with 16% African Americans with primary HPT and 45% African Americans with secondary/tertiary HPT. High cure rates with no statistical difference (p=0.49) were seen between the two groups: 99% for primary HPT and 97% for secondary/tertiary HPT. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in length of stay (0.2 days), rates of transient or permanent hoarseness, transient or permanent hypocalcemia, or wound complications.

Conclusion:
Despite the difference in comorbidities and pathology in patients with primary versus secondary/tertiary HPT, there were no differences in cure rate, complications, or hospital length of stay. Patients with all types of HPT can be managed with outpatient parathyroidectomy.
 

46.15 Incidental Thyroid Carcinoma in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Benign Thyroid Disease

M. Manasa1, O. Picado1, M. L. Mao1, R. Minami1, J. C. Farra1, J. I. Lew1  1University Of Miami Leonard M. Miller School Of Medicine,Division Of Endocrine Surgery, DeWitt Daughtry Family, Department Of Surgery,Miami, FL, USA

Introduction: Patients with benign thyroid disease undergo thyroidectomy for a variety of reasons including compressive symptoms, hyperthyroidism and cosmesis. Although patients are referred for benign disease, underlying thyroid malignancy may be incidentally discovered on final pathology. This study examines the association between benign indication for thyroid surgery and incidental thyroid cancer.

Methods: A retrospective review of 1,040 patients undergoing thyroid surgery at a tertiary referral center was performed. Surgical indications for benign thyroid disease (n=357) included compressive symptoms, hyperthyroidism, goiter size >4 cm, substernal goiter, cosmesis, and patient preference. A dominant or “index” thyroid nodule was defined as a nodule >1 cm or the largest/most suspicious thyroid nodule in a multinodular goiter (MNG). An “incidental” thyroid carcinoma was defined as any cancer incidentally discovered outside the index nodule. Patients with previous thyroid surgery, indeterminate or malignant preoperative FNA results were excluded.

Results: Of 916 patients who underwent thyroidectomy, 559 were referred for malignancy and 357 for benign disease. Patients with benign disease were referred most commonly for non-toxic MNG (n=223, 63%) followed by Graves’ disease (n=46, 13%), non-toxic solitary nodule (n=40, 11%), toxic MNG (n=32, 9%), and substernal goiter (n=16, 4%). Final pathology demonstrated incidental thyroid carcinoma in 97 patients (27%): 39 (40%) had a malignant index nodule, 36 (37%) had incidental thyroid carcinoma, and 23 (23%) had both index and incidental malignancy. The median size of malignant index nodules was 2 cm (range: 0.1-6 cm) and the median size of incidental carcinomas was 0.4 cm (range: 0.1-5.8 cm). Lymphovascular invasion was present in 20% (19/97) and extrathyroidal extension was present in 8% (8/97) of patients. Patients with non-toxic solitary nodule (n=18, 45%) most commonly had incidental carcinoma followed by non-toxic MNG (n=69, 31%), substernal goiter (n=4, 25%), toxic MNG (n=5, 16%) and Graves’ disease (n=4, 9%). The most common malignancy found on final pathology was papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC, n=93, 96%) followed by follicular (n=2, 2%), medullary (n=1, 1%), and anaplastic (n=1, 1%) thyroid cancer. The majority of PTC were follicular variant (n=69, 74%) followed by classical (n=20, 22%), tall cell (n=2, 2%), and diffuse sclerosing (n=2, 2%) variants.

Conclusion: Patients undergoing surgery for benign thyroid disease have significant rates of occult malignancy on final pathology. Despite these high rates of underlying malignancy, the majority of these tumors are low risk thyroid malignancies based on American Thyroid Association risk stratification and thus do not warrant further extensive surgical or clinical management. Nevertheless, careful evaluation and counseling by a surgeon may be necessary in managing patients with benign thyroid disease.

46.16 Understanding Nationwide Readmissions After Thyroid Surgery

A. Rios-Diaz1, R. Zheng1, D. P. Thibault2, J. A. Crispo2, A. W. Willis2, A. I. Willis1  1Thomas Jefferson University,Department Of Surgery,Philadelphia, PA, USA 2University Of Pennsylvania,Department Of Biostatistics And Epidemiology,Philadelphia, PA, USA

Introduction:  The 30-day readmission rate is increasingly utilized as a metric of quality impacting reimbursement. To date, there are no national data on readmission rates after thyroid surgery. We aimed to determine national readmission rates and associated clinical factors for patients with thyroidectomy operations at a national level.

Methods:  Using the 2014 Nationwide Readmission Database, we identified patients undergoing thyroid surgery as defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, procedure codes for thyroid lobectomy, partial thyroidectomy, complete thyroidectomy and substernal thyroidectomy. Descriptive statistics were used to examine readmission rates, most common causes for readmission and timing of presentation after discharge. Adjusted multivariable logistic regression models controlling for potential confounders were used to determine factors associated with increased 30-day readmission. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results: A total of 22,654 patients underwent thyroid surgery in the study period and 990 (4.37%) were readmitted within 30 days. Among these, the most common diagnoses for readmission were "disorders of mineral metabolism" accounting for 36% and "hypocalcemia" for 26.6%. This held true regardless of the indication for surgery (goiter, cancer or thyroid function disorder) or timing of readmission after discharge. Most readmissions (54.6%) occurred within seven days of discharge, with 24.6% within the first 48 hours. Factors associated with increased readmission odds included Medicare insurance (Adjusted Odds Ratio 1.47 [95% Confidence Interval 1.03-2.11]), Medicaid insurance (AOR 1.44 [CI 1.04-1.99]), discharge to inpatient post acute care (AOR 2.31 [CI 1.48-3.62]) or home with home healthcare (AOR 1.78 [CI 1.21-2.63]), Elixhauser comorbidity score ≥ 4 (AOR 2.04 [CI 1.27-3.26]), length of stay ≥  2 days (AOR 2.7 [CI 1.9-3.82]). Hypocalcemia was the only complication during the index admission that was associated with increased odds of readmission (AOR 1.5 [CI 1.1-2.06]). (All AOR P<0.01). There was no association of diagnosis indication for surgery or type of procedure with odds of readmissions.

Conclusion: A considerable proportion of thyroidectomy patients are readmitted early after thyroid surgery. The most common diagnosis for readmission is hypocalcemia/mineral metabolism disorder. Socioeconomic factors, comorbidities and complications during index admissions are significantly associated with increased readmissions. Recognition of these risk factors may decrease readmission rates as well as guide further policy discussions regarding readmissions.

 

46.17 Early Intraoperative PTH Values Can Help Guide Surgical Decision Making

N. C. Luehmann1, J. A. Cirino1, P. F. Czako1, S. Nagar1  1William Beaumont Hospital,Department Of Surgery,Royal Oak, MI, USA

Introduction:  The advent of intraoperative parathyroid hormone (ioPTH) monitoring has enhanced the efficacy of parathyroidectomy by allowing surgeons to ensure that all abnormal parathyroid tissue is excised in the operating room. Although ioPTH monitoring has been a revolutionary development, limitations are faced when initial ioPTH values do not meet accepted criteria. Surgeons must decide whether to proceed with further dissection or wait for additional ioPTH levels to return. The purpose of our study was to review our 5-minute post-gland excision ioPTH (5-min ioPTH) data to determine if there are trends that identify patients at risk for multigland disease, thereby allowing further dissection to begin sooner.

Methods:  A retrospective chart review was performed for all patients who underwent parathyroidectomy with ioPTH monitoring from January 2001 through March 2015 at Beaumont Hospital’s Royal Oak campus. We specifically studied patients who had a 5-min ioPTH level drawn. Patients were excluded if they were less than 18 years old, had surgery for secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism, re-operative parathyroidectomy, concomitant thyroid procedures, other prior neck operations, or a thoracic procedure to remove an intrathoracic parathyroid gland. Methodology used in previous studies looking at this idea was employed in our study. Patient’s charts were reviewed to document baseline pre-excision PTH level, 5-min ioPTH level, final pathology with respect to single adenoma (SA), double adenomas (DA), or four gland hyperplasia (4G), and post-operative calcium levels to determine cure, persistence, or recurrence. 

Results: In total, 621 patients had a 5-min ioPTH level and were included. The median baseline ioPTH for the cured, persistence, and recurrence groups was similar at 134, 119, and 136 pg/mL, respectively (p=0.18). However, the median 5-min ioPTH was lower in the cured group compared to the persistence and recurrence groups (37, 58 and 58 pg/mL, respectively) (p=0.002). Similarly, the percent decline in PTH from baseline to 5-min ioPTH was significantly greater in the cured group at 74% versus 47% in the persistence and 51% in the recurrence groups (p<0.001). Within the subset of patients cured from the index operation, median 5-min ioPTH between those with SA, DA, and 4G was 36, 51, and 93 pg/mL, respectively (p<0.001). Percent decline in PTH from baseline to 5-min ioPTH was 74% for the SA group and decreased to 60% in the DA group and 17% in the 4G group (p<0.001). Finally, a ROC analysis conducted using the same subset of patients indicated that a 35% decline from baseline to the 5-min ioPTH is needed to best distinguish a SA from DA or 4G (sensitivity 49.4% and specificity 98.9%).

Conclusion: Our results indicate that 5min-ioPTH values are lower in SA versus DA and 4G. Additionally, we found that if a decline of >35% between baseline and ioPTH is not achieved, consideration for further dissection is warranted.