E. H. Wood1, K. Calabrese2, D. Murray2, K. Foley2, K. Nagato2, M. Nishimura1,2 1Loyola University Medical Center,Surgery,Maywood, ILLINOIS, USA 2Loyola University Chicago,Oncology Institute,Chicago, IL, USA
Introduction:
Adoptive cell transfer of T cells engineered to express receptors with specific anti-tumor effects has shown great promise in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. However, exogenously introduced T cell receptors (TCR) must compete with endogenous receptors for surface expression resulting in blunted anti-tumor activity. Our goal is to create TCR modifications that will enhance receptor pairing resulting in increased surface expression and improved tumor recognition.
Methods:
Using TCR 1383I, a receptor against the melanoma antigen tyrosinase, the following modifications were made: codon optimization, introduction of a disulfide bridge into the constant region, introduction of a cytoplasmic leucine zipper, and murinization of the constant regions. These modifications have all been demonstrated in the literature to improve receptor pairing; however, they have never been tested side by side in the same TCR. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were transduced with each modification. Surface expression and peptide recognition were studied using multicolor flow cytometry, alanine scanning, and intracellular and extracellular cytokine release assays (IFN-γ TNF-α , IL-2, IL-4, IL-22, IL-17A, and CD107a).
Results:
While the disulfide bridge and codon optimized TCRs demonstrated enhanced surface expression compared to the wild type receptor, there was no improvement in peptide recognition and anti-tumor effects. Only the murinized TCR significantly improved receptor pairing and surface expression. This receptor dramatically increased antigenic peptide recognition, and also altered the complement of cytokines produced by the lymphocytes. T cells expressing the murinized TCR not only secreted more cytokine but exhibited increased polyfunctionality compared to all other modifications and wild type. We utilized alanine scanning to delineate the interaction between the tyrosinase peptide and each TCR modification. The disulfide bridge, codon optimized, and leucine zipper modified TCRs demonstrated the same peptide recognition patterns as the wild type receptor, however the murinized receptor appeared to be less restricted.
Conclusion:
TCR modifications were created in an attempt to enhance receptor pairing and T cell functionality. In the context of TCR 1383I, only the murinized modification consistently improved pairing, T cell surface expression, and anti-tumor functionality. TCRs require a CD3 coreceptor to initiate its signaling cascade and murine TCRs have been shown to have higher affinity for CD3 allowing our target TCR to outcompete endogenous receptor expression. The modification may have also created a conformational change allowing better recognition of target antigens. Future studies are needed to assess peptide-TCR interactions on a molecular level, to examine cross-reactivity against other peptides, and to establish an in vivo model.