D. P. Bliss1, N. M. Vaughan2, R. A. Walk3, J. A. Naiditch4, A. A. Kane5, R. R. Hallac6 1Childrens Hospital Colorado/University Of Colorado School Of Medicine,Division Of Pediatric Surgery/Department Of Surgery,Colorado Springs, CO, USA 2Baylor University Medical Center At Dallas,Dallas, TX, USA 3Brooke Army Medical Center/US Army Medical Corps,San Antonio, TX, USA 4Dell Children’s Medical Center Of Central Texas,Austin, TX, USA 5UT Southwestern Medical Center,Division Of Plastic Surgery,Dallas, TX, USA 6Children’s Medical Center Dallas,Dallas, TX, USA
Introduction:
In order to avoid the radiation exposure of CT imaging and the expense of either CT or MRI studies, we sought to develop a non-radiographic severity measurement of pectus excavatum. 3D photographic imaging of patients with chest wall deformities provided the non-radiographic data collection for this evaluation.
Methods:
Over a twenty-eight month period, ten consecutive patient volunteers with pectus excavatum underwent 3D stereo-photogrammetric imaging of the torso. The 3D photographic surface images were manipulated in cross section and then evaluated by three separate examiners. Body measurements such as surface lengths, surface areas, and volumes were collected for each patient by each examiner on three separate occasions. The surface width to surface depth ratio was calculated for each patient (Surface Lengths Pectus Index), using averaged measurements obtained across the maximal pectus excavatum defect (see Figure). Likewise, the chest deformity’s surface area to total chest surface area (Pectus Surface Area Ratio) and the chest deformity’s volume to total chest volume (Pectus Volume Ratio) were calculated. Simple linear regression analysis was used to compare the Surface Lengths Pectus Index, Pectus Surface Area Ratio, and Pectus Volume Ratio calculations each to the corresponding known CT Pectus Index values.
Results:
For the pectus excavatum patients imaged (n=10), simple linear regression analysis of the CT Pectus Index versus Surface Lengths Pectus Index (see Figure) yielded a coefficient of determination (R squared) of 0.7637 and a p value of 0.0013. A CT
Pectus Index equal to or greater than 3.4 was measured in eight patients. A CT Pectus Index of 3.4 or greater corresponded to a Surface Lengths Pectus Index of 1.86 or greater, measured in six of these eight patients. In contrast, the CT Pectus Index versus Pectus Surface Area Ratio yielded a coefficient of determination (R squared) of 0.4627 and a p value of 0.0305 and the CT Pectus Index versus the Pectus Volume Ratio yielded a coefficient of determination (R squared) of 0.3048 and a p value of 0.0990.
Conclusion:
The use of Surface Lengths Pectus Index corresponds to the CT Pectus Index in this study cohort. Importantly, manipulation of photographic surface measurements is analogous to physical exam. The use of a chest radiograph and physical exam measurements alone to calculate a Surface Lengths Pectus Index may be adequate to determine severity of pectus excavatum in some patients and thereby improve safety and cost effectiveness in the preoperative evaluation of patients with pectus excavatum.